Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved Usage Example #6

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 7, 2024
Merged

Improved Usage Example #6

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 7, 2024

Conversation

reactive-firewall
Copy link
Owner

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall commented Oct 3, 2024

Note

Due to the backup, upstream with actions/starter-workflows#2497 not yet resolved, this PR will include at-least two minor version bumps:


Release Notes v2.2-v2.3

Summary

Minor improvement to README. Reduce alert threshold level to low in example to improve real-world relevance. By reducing the threshold level more security issues will be flagged, ultimately leading to more fixes.

  • Documentation
    • Updated the version of the Bandit scan action to v2.3.
    • Changed the severity level for reporting issues from high to low.
    • Commented out the exit_zero option in the usage example.
    • Updated credit line to include new contributor "MrFired" and adjusted formatting for Dependabot mention.
  • New Features
    • Introduced a new input parameter config_path for specifying a path to a YAML or TOML file for command line arguments.
    • Added an overwrite: true option for the artifact upload step to prevent conflicts with existing artifacts.

Special Thanks

🙇 Co-Authored with @MrFired

MrFired and others added 4 commits April 26, 2024 00:17
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall self-assigned this Oct 3, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

In this pull request, the README.md file for the Bandit scan action is updated to reflect a version change from v2.1 to v2.3, with the severity level for reporting issues adjusted from high to low. The exit_zero option is now commented out, indicating its removal from the usage example. Additionally, a new input parameter config_path is introduced in action.yml, allowing users to specify a path for configuration files, while the upload artifact step is modified to enable overwriting existing artifacts.

Changes

Files Change Summary
README.md - Updated version from v2.1 to v2.3
- Changed severity level from high to low
- Commented out exit_zero option
- Updated credit line for Dependabot
action.yml - Added new input parameter config_path (default: 'DEFAULT')
- Updated script logic for config_path
- Modified Upload artifact step to include overwrite: true

Possibly related PRs

  • Updates and Automation #1: The changes in the README.md file regarding the Bandit action version update from v1 to v2 are related to the main PR's update of the Bandit scan action version from v2.1 to v2.3.
  • Pull useful improvements from Community #7: This PR introduces the same new input parameter config_path in the action.yml file, which is also a part of the main PR's changes, enhancing the configurability of the Bandit Scan action.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f8cf05e and c56ff8d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

14-14: Ah, the cosmic dance of version numbers! A celestial shift from v2.1 to v2.2 has occurred.

Just as our universe expands, so too does this action evolve. This incremental leap in versioning suggests a gravitational pull towards progress. However, much like the mysteries of dark matter, the exact nature of these changes remains hidden from view.

To illuminate this cosmic update for fellow explorers of code, might I suggest including a link to the release notes? This would provide a map of the new features or fixes in this version, guiding users through the vast expanse of changes.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff1a646 and 637c5c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

19-19: Behold, we've adjusted our cosmic lens to peer deeper into the security nebula!

By lowering our severity threshold from 'high' to 'low', we've expanded our view of the security cosmos. This is akin to upgrading from a backyard telescope to the Hubble Space Telescope. We're now capable of detecting fainter signals in the vast expanse of code.

However, be prepared for an influx of data. Just as the Hubble revealed countless new galaxies, this change will unveil a multitude of security issues previously hidden in the cosmic background. It's a trade-off between comprehensive security and the time required to process this newfound information. Choose wisely, for with great power comes great responsibility!


22-22: Ah, we've recalibrated our cosmic alarm system!

By commenting out the 'exit_zero' parameter, we've transformed our security scanner from a passive observer into an active sentinel. It's like upgrading from merely cataloging asteroids to actually sounding the alarm when one is on a collision course with Earth.

This celestial shift in behavior could cause ripples across the cosmos of CI/CD pipelines. To ensure our fellow cosmic travelers are prepared for this new gravitational reality, I suggest we add a note about this change in the PR description. Let's run a quick scan of our cosmic neighborhood to see who might be affected:

This cosmic survey will help us identify any celestial bodies that might need to adjust their orbits in response to our new security gravity well.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Github All things meta labels Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Owner Author

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! These minor changes are ready to merge, once the upstream actions/starter-workflows#2497 is resolved.

# Pull useful improvements from community

## Pull new configuration input feature from related work in community

* Incorporate the feature to optionally include a `config_path` input to
allow further configuration of `bandit`

## Partial version bumps for action dependancies

* Updating to `github/code-action/upload-sarif@v3` presents no
significant changes since `v2` besides the underlying node version.
Details in [relevant project
README](https://github.com/github/codeql-action?tab=readme-ov-file#supported-versions-of-the-codeql-action)

* Updating to `actions/upload-artifact@v4` brings significant changes we
should be aware of. The maintainers have noted that version 4 introduces
breaking changes:

* **GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES) Compatibility**: Support for GHES
versions prior to 3.5 has been discontinued. If you're using an older
GHES version, this update might not be compatible.
* **Default Behavior Adjustments**: There may be changes to default
configurations, such as the default value for retention-days. Deprecated
inputs or features might have been removed as well.

For a comprehensive understanding of these impacts and to ensure
seamless integration, please review the maintainers' notes in the
[upload-artifact project
README](https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact#actionsupload-artifact)

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced an optional `config_path` parameter for the Bandit Scan
action, allowing users to specify a configuration file for command line
arguments.

- **Improvements**
- Updated artifact upload steps to use the latest versions of the
actions, enhancing reliability and functionality.
	- Added an option to overwrite existing artifacts during upload.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 13, 2024
@reactive-firewall

This comment was marked as outdated.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall merged commit ba51d0c into main Dec 7, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Github All things meta
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants