-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 471
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(linter): implement eslint/no-useless-call #7473
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into mainAdd the label “0-merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix. You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. |
"obj.foo.apply();", | ||
"obj?.foo.bar.call(obj.foo, 1, 2);", | ||
"class C { #call; wrap(foo) { foo.#call(undefined, 1, 2); } }", | ||
//"(obj?.foo).test.bar.call(obj?.foo.test, 1, 2);", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
eslint ignores this case because of the parenthesis on the (obj?.foo)
.
i think we should report this
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #7473 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
based on #4393