Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2.2] Fix compile-time warnings caused by duplicate struct typedefs #16880

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

robn
Copy link
Member

@robn robn commented Dec 18, 2024

Motivation and Context

Backport #16665.

Closes #16879.

Description

The platform specific header sys/abd_os.h shouldn't define or use abd_t, as it's defined in its non-platform specific consumer sys/abd.h. Do the same as what FreeBSD header does.

How Has This Been Tested?

Compile checked against 6.7.12 w/ Clang/LLVM and 6.1.102 w/ GCC.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

Some compiler/versions warn these typedefs according to openzfs#16660.

The platform specific header sys/abd_os.h shouldn't define or use abd_t,
as it's defined in its non-platform specific consumer sys/abd.h.
Do the same as what FreeBSD header does.

Original-patch-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rob Norris <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit a9851ea)
@behlendorf behlendorf added the Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) label Dec 18, 2024
@tonyhutter tonyhutter merged commit ff7d051 into openzfs:zfs-2.2.8-staging Dec 18, 2024
19 of 20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants