Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.15] OCPBUGS-46075: Do not send traffic to local audit-webhook through konnectivity #5274

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.15
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4883

/assign csrwng

In managed services, a local audit-webhook service is used to forward
audit logs externally. This traffic should not be routed through
konnectivity since it goes to a local service in the control plane.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43046 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46075. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-46075: Do not send traffic to local audit-webhook through konnectivity

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4883

/assign csrwng

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-43046: Do not send traffic to local audit-webhook through konnectivity [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-46075: Do not send traffic to local audit-webhook through konnectivity Dec 11, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 11, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46075, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43046 is in the state Closed (Done-Errata), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43046 targets the "4.16.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.16.0, 4.16.z
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4883

/assign csrwng

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from csrwng and hasueki December 11, 2024 22:04
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added area/control-plane-operator Indicates the PR includes changes for the control plane operator - in an OCP release and removed do-not-merge/needs-area labels Dec 11, 2024
@csrwng
Copy link
Contributor

csrwng commented Dec 11, 2024

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 11, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: csrwng, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 11, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2bf0a0c and 2 for PR HEAD a4cfcda in total

3 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2bf0a0c and 2 for PR HEAD a4cfcda in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2bf0a0c and 2 for PR HEAD a4cfcda in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2bf0a0c and 2 for PR HEAD a4cfcda in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 9541d89 and 1 for PR HEAD a4cfcda in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f780ca7 and 0 for PR HEAD a4cfcda in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/hold

Revision a4cfcda was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 15, 2024
@csrwng
Copy link
Contributor

csrwng commented Dec 18, 2024

/retest-required

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 18, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws a4cfcda link true /test e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/control-plane-operator Indicates the PR includes changes for the control plane operator - in an OCP release do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants