Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update getting started to match latest edge #247

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SevereOverfl0w
Copy link
Contributor

I dropped the swagger section for now. I think this needs more
consideration in the config.edn-driven world.

Copy link

@cldwalker cldwalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ran the example today on osx and noted a couple differences. Two of the differences that need to be updated throughout this PR are the port number and the generated namespace. Would be great to get this in soon


....
user=> (dev)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This didn't exist for my version. I got Syntax error compiling at (REPL:1:1)

dev=> (go)
[Edge] Website can be browsed at http://localhost:3000/
[Edge] Website listening on: http://localhost:3000

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The generated app defaulted to http://localhost:7272

....

=== Locate the source code

Fire up an editor and load up the file `src/edge/hello.clj`.
Fire up an editor and load up the file `src/yada/manual/app/foo.clj`.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My app had the file src/yada/manual/app/core.clj generated

[[hello-swagger]]
=== Hello Swagger!

[WARNING]
====
Swagger is not set up this easily in edge any more, this section is out of date.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bummer. This was the part I was interested in

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants