Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for disabled selectors in config flow #22592

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

karwosts
Copy link
Contributor

@karwosts karwosts commented Oct 29, 2024

Proposed change

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (thank you!)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Example configuration

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue or discussion:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

MindFreeze
MindFreeze previously approved these changes Oct 30, 2024
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ export interface HaFormBaseSchema {
suffix?: string;
// This value will be set initially when form is loaded
suggested_value?: HaFormData;
// Readonly flag is passed here from backend for config flow
readonly?: boolean;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nitpick: isn't read only 2 words? And so it should be read_only and readOnly

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're technically correct. readonly is pretty established in frontend libraries though. We won't use it directly and convert it to disabled so whatever core decides as long as it isn't disabled

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/style-guide/a-z-word-list-term-collections/r/read-only gives read-only which seems to also be in the dictionaries.
We should probably change to read_only which translates to read-only

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can change the var to read_only, but I'm confused by what you mean by "translates to read-only"

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I meant for end users it should say "read-only".
I didn't look at the frontend PR really but is there a tooltip or something for the end-users to understand these are read-only on purpose?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I know there is not a tooltip.

Maybe custom description strings could be used for the options flow fields if desired, right now they are reusing the description strings from the config flow.

I thought another enhancement could be to stick these fields in an expansion panel with a description of why they are there, but reading how config/options flow is handled in history stats I couldn't yet figure out how to make that work, so punting on that for now.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe custom description strings could be used for the options flow fields if desired, right now they are reusing the description strings from the config flow.

Probably the best way to handle it right now.

I thought another enhancement could be to stick these fields in an expansion panel with a description of why they are there, but reading how config/options flow is handled in history stats I couldn't yet figure out how to make that work, so punting on that for now.

Probably a section with a description would be quite nice. But sections are not really built in that way to only be used in the options flow as it's saving the data with the section.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants