Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

API Review: CoreWebView2Frame.FrameCreated #4982

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

JosephJin0815
Copy link
Contributor

This is a review for the new CoreWebView2Frame.FrameCreated API.

@JosephJin0815 JosephJin0815 added the API Proposal Review WebView2 API Proposal for review. label Dec 10, 2024
for the nested iframe.

To prevent unnecessary performance implication, WebView2 does
not track any nested iframes by default. It only tracks a nested
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems to violate Windows Runtime guidelines, because it means that you don't get a CoreWebView2.FrameNavigationStarting unless you subscribe to the FrameCreated event (even if the event handler does nothing).

❌ DO NOT alter behavior based on whether an event handler is registered or the number of registered event handlers. In other words, registering an event handler that does nothing should have no effect on behavior.

An implementation is permitted to perform optimizations based on whether an event handler is registered. The most common case of this is bypassing an expensive operation if there is no way for the app to observe any of the operation’s side effects.

In this case, the app can observe the side effects (through the FrameNavigationStarting event).

We could have a new Boolean property on the frame ShouldRaiseNavigationEvents which defaults to true for first-level frames and false for deeper frames. (But see the componentization problem later.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I need to clarify the documentation here. The CoreWebView2.FrameNavigationStarting event will still be triggered for all child iframes, regardless of whether we subscribe to the CoreWebView2Frame.FrameCreated event or not. In this context, we are referring to the APIs in CoreWebView2Frame. We think that event handler matters because if developers do not subscribe to it, there is no need to expose any CoreWebView2Frame APIs

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please clarify that this is an implementation note. This is only about an internal perf optimization - no observable behavior changes described here.

Comment on lines 104 to 105
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
}
}
};
};

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix.

std::map<int, std::vector<std::wstring>> m_frame_navigation_urls;
// In this example, a WebView2 application wants to manage the
// navigation of third-party content residing in second-level iframes
// (Main frame -> First-level frame -> Second-level third-party frames).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe also a sample showing full depth frame tracking?

void TrackAllFrameNavigations()
{
   webView.CoreWebView2.FrameCreated += (_, args) =>
   {
      OnFrameCreated(args.Frame);
   };
}

void OnFrameCreated(CoreWebView2Frame frame)
{
    frame.FrameCreated += (_, e) => OnFrameCreated(e.Frame);
    frame.NavigationStarting += OnFrameNavigationStarting;
}

void OnFrameNavigationStarting(object sender, CoreWebView2NavigationStartingEventArgs e)
{
    // as before
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please consider adding an additional sample.

CHECK_FAILURE(args->get_Frame(&webviewFrame));
// Track nested (second-level) webview frame.
auto frame7 = webviewFrame.try_query<ICoreWebView2Frame7>();
frame7->add_FrameCreated(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need a null check on frame7 in case the try_query fails.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix.

Callback<ICoreWebView2FrameNavigationStartingEventHandler>(
[this](
ICoreWebView2Frame* sender,
ICoreWebView2NavigationStartingEventArgs* args) -> HRESULT {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
ICoreWebView2NavigationStartingEventArgs* args) -> HRESULT {
ICoreWebView2NavigationStartingEventArgs* args) noexcept -> HRESULT {

Fail fast if an exception comes out of the [] or push_back.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix.

### C++ Sample
```cpp
wil::com_ptr<ICoreWebView2> m_webview;
std::map<int, std::vector<std::wstring>> m_frame_navigation_urls;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
std::map<int, std::vector<std::wstring>> m_frame_navigation_urls;
std::map<UINT32, std::vector<std::wstring>> m_frame_navigation_urls;

Why not just use a UINT32 to match the type of FrameId?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix.

// navigation if it's on block list.
UINT32 frameId = 0;
auto frame5 = wil::com_ptr<ICoreWebView2Frame>(sender)
.try_query<ICoreWebView2Frame5>();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing null check from try_query. Maybe we should use ICoreWebView2Frame5 in the outer lambda, so that we don't even get here if v5 is not supported. Then that would allow us to use query() instead of try_query().

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please consider simple fix of null check for simple sample code.

// navigation if it's on block list.
UINT32 frameId = 0;
auto frame5 = wil::com_ptr<ICoreWebView2Frame>(sender)
.try_query<ICoreWebView2Frame5>();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can be simplified to

auto frame5 = wil::try_com_query<ICoreWebView2Frame5>(sender);

avoids an unnecessary temporary com_ptr.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix.

events will be raised from the top-level iframe. With the support
of tracking nested iframes, we can now handle these requests directly
within the nested iframe. Specifically, these requests are raised to
the nearest tracked frame, which is the `CoreWebView2Frame` closest
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could lead to a problem if an app combines multiple components, and one of them adds a FrameCreated handler and accidentally messes up the other component which expected the event from the top-level frame. Is the answer "Yeah, you can't really componentize your app like that because features used by one app might have adverse consequences far away." So it means I can't have a "app usage telemetry" component that hooks all frame activity and logs it, because that would accidentally break my "permission manager" component.

From the Windows Runtime design guidelines:

A Well-Designed API Avoids Shared Behavior

A developer is often unpleasantly surprised when he or she uses one API that causes a side-effect elsewhere.

☑ DO design APIs to allow multiple components running in the same process to use the API without having to explicitly coordinate, for example, two plug-ins loaded into the same instance of Internet Explorer

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For PermissionRequested API, there are two factors. One is the presence of the FrameCreated handler, and the other is the need to handle the PermissionRequested API. Simply subscribing to the FrameCreated handler does not affect where the PermissionRequested event is actually handled.
Suppose there is a permission request from frame D. Developers want to handle the PermissionRequested event from the top-level iframe B in component I. Meanwhile, in component II, developers have an "app usage telemetry" that hooks all frame activity. Unless the developers subscribe to the permission request and Handled in either frame D or frame C, otherwise the PermissionRequested event will still bubble up to the top-level iframe and handle in component I.

// Example:
//    A (main frame/CoreWebView2)
//    |
//    B (first-level iframe/CoreWebView2Frame)
//    |  
//    C (nested iframe)
//    |
//    D (nested iframe)

But I think this kind of shared behavior should be avoid by developers. Even if we, align with the browser, track all iframes by default and the PermissionRequested event starts to fire on the iframe where it originates, there could be shared behavior issue. If developers handle the PermissionRequested event in a nested iframe within one component, then another component won't have the opportunity to handle the PermissionRequested event at the top-level iframe.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issue after discussion: event bubbles out in existing event bubbling pattern.

Copy link
Contributor

@david-risney david-risney left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please update according to comments, thanks!

for the nested iframe.

To prevent unnecessary performance implication, WebView2 does
not track any nested iframes by default. It only tracks a nested
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please clarify that this is an implementation note. This is only about an internal perf optimization - no observable behavior changes described here.

### C++ Sample
```cpp
wil::com_ptr<ICoreWebView2> m_webview;
std::map<int, std::vector<std::wstring>> m_frame_navigation_urls;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix.

std::map<int, std::vector<std::wstring>> m_frame_navigation_urls;
// In this example, a WebView2 application wants to manage the
// navigation of third-party content residing in second-level iframes
// (Main frame -> First-level frame -> Second-level third-party frames).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please consider adding an additional sample.

CHECK_FAILURE(args->get_Frame(&webviewFrame));
// Track nested (second-level) webview frame.
auto frame7 = webviewFrame.try_query<ICoreWebView2Frame7>();
frame7->add_FrameCreated(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix.

Callback<ICoreWebView2FrameNavigationStartingEventHandler>(
[this](
ICoreWebView2Frame* sender,
ICoreWebView2NavigationStartingEventArgs* args) -> HRESULT {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix.

// navigation if it's on block list.
UINT32 frameId = 0;
auto frame5 = wil::com_ptr<ICoreWebView2Frame>(sender)
.try_query<ICoreWebView2Frame5>();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please consider simple fix of null check for simple sample code.

// navigation if it's on block list.
UINT32 frameId = 0;
auto frame5 = wil::com_ptr<ICoreWebView2Frame>(sender)
.try_query<ICoreWebView2Frame5>();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix.

Comment on lines 104 to 105
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix.

events will be raised from the top-level iframe. With the support
of tracking nested iframes, we can now handle these requests directly
within the nested iframe. Specifically, these requests are raised to
the nearest tracked frame, which is the `CoreWebView2Frame` closest
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issue after discussion: event bubbles out in existing event bubbling pattern.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API Proposal Review WebView2 API Proposal for review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants