-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 383
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[feat] Single plist #4364
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[feat] Single plist #4364
Conversation
90535b3
to
651f925
Compare
This patch adds the logic of report output merging into one singluar `.plist` file. Now analyze and check can be invoked with the `--plist-file-name` option, which if provided will merge all new `.plist` result files into the specified file name under the specified output report folder.
81813a5
to
9e66f53
Compare
def merge_plists(results, output_path, plist_file_name): | ||
""" | ||
Merge the plist files generated by the analyzers into a single plist file. | ||
Deletes the original plist files after merging. | ||
""" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any reason why we are not reusing the method introduced in #4152? That also merged multiple plist files, while also uniquing bug report with the same hash (as generated by get_report_path_hash()
, not by the analyzer).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally speaking, I'm highly against the fixation on a specific output format. Sure, plist is the format we use, and will likely use way past you and I bite the dust, but its still distracting. I prefer consistently naming user-facing configs like "output-single-file" instead of "plist-single-file".
On another issue, as I stated in my previous response, there is no reason not to unique the reports in the unified plist file, for which we already implemented a solution. Having the same thing be implemented twice needs more justification.
Also, I'm missing a great dose of "why" in the summary. Why do we need this feature? I understand that this in part to better support bazel projects. Why is it needed/advantegeous to generate a single plist files for them? These kinds of details should be most highlighted in the summary.
edit: also, I don't think the PR name has a character limit! :)
This patch adds the logic of report output merging into one singular
.plist
file. Now analyze and check can be invoked with the--plist-file-name
option, which if provided will merge all new.plist
result files into the specified file name under the specified output report folder.