Exceeding size limits (50mb) for Serverless Functions #103
Replies: 63 comments 160 replies
-
Here's an example of using taking screenshots inside a function, which does not exceed limits: https://github.com/vercel/virtual-event-starter-kit/blob/main/lib/screenshot.ts |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For me it happens because it's uploading all my assets in /public to the serverless functions. To avoid it, I have to adding "excludeFiles" to vercel.json. This would be fine if there wasn't a related bug, where excludeFiles can't be applied to "pages/api/*", which is where the serverless functions normally are. What I had to do to fix it is moving all serverless functions to /api (outside of pages), and now excludeFiles is working. But this creates other headaches as now my api functions are not working using "yarn dev". Could you take a look into "excludeFiles" and why it doesn't work on /pages/api? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Note: Python currently doesn't do any bundling, so this is still the correct solution mentioned: vercel/vercel#2830 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Mr. Robinson! We have an api route that is very small and simply sends an email and should not exceed any limits. This is our api route: https://github.com/New-Millenia-Consulting/operation-medical-care/blob/main/pages/api/contact.ts However, I believe this is simply due to incorrect reporting of the error. What was actually happening was that we had a page that was statically importing many many images for Next 11's image blurs. See this commit. Once we changed all of these static imports back to standard string sources, the build passed. So I believe that in our case, the serverless function generated for the about page (in the commit linked) is the function actually exceeding the limit. There is nothing wrong with the Edit: There have been a few commits since the issue but I am able to find the exact commits where the issue occurs if you would like something reproducible. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For some reason, I have to exclude |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We currently ran into this problem aswell - running here are the compiled lambda functions, wich vercel is supposed to push to aws:
but instead it looks like he pushes the whole node_modules src to the lambda function:
would be great if someone can advise what we can try to not include these |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Got this since I haven't defined a specific version of the nuxt/vercel-builder and it had an upgrade to 0.22 which breaks. After defining a version for in the config manually, it works like a charm. Maybe that helps someone. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I just realized that by using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is such a headache :( |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi everyone, I'm new to deploying with Vercel and using Nuxt and I am running into this issue as well. I read somewhere that I should move everything from Here are my dependencies:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I can't get excludes to work properly. I have a minimal repo here where my function takes <5mb and another one here where the function takes 69.61mb. I can't figure out what to exclude. Excluding Yet, clearly, the bundle contains a bunch of junk that the code does not depend on. Note: I'm not using Next. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm having issues with this since updating to Next12, seems like all the files from a folder that's accessed in a getStaticProps() function get taken into the bundle. The serverless function is used to read .md files to display on the specific page, based on a slug. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here is the minimal reproducible repo. If I add an API route or SSR route it fails even though API/SSR route has no dependecy on the images (which have 50mb+ size and are referred only in SSG pages).
Error screenshot: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have a randomly appeared warning about 50mb as well on next12 and python. Why is it randomly? If I press "redeploy" button on the build page of my project, it can go well. Actually, it always goes well if I press "redeploy". from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler
from datetime import datetime
class handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
self.send_response(200)
self.send_header('Content-type', 'text/plain')
self.end_headers()
self.wfile.write(str(datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')).encode())
return While js-driven functions use 7-8Mb. This makes CI/CD process unreliable and manual: i have to press 'redeploy' button every time it happens (30-40% of time, when the python function is the same) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Experiencing similar issues. Was borrowing some code from this repo (to generate og-images). The above repo seems to deploy just fine w/o any size problems. However, on our repo the serverless function balloons up to 75mb and seems to include a bunch of unrelated files.
Not sure whats going on and have opened up a support ticket. Haven't received a response yet. We're on Next |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Edit: We've discovered the problem it was not next doing anything weird.. someone had committed a 50mb svg! 🤯 I now have this maddening scenario of the .next/ folder being huge. we're on next 13.3.0
We've tried all sorts. this is our current next.config
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@leerob, it's been 2 years and 0 updates on this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, I'm also facing the same issue when trying to deploy my django app ( it's a portfolio). Though on disk the size of build files is 20 MB and the requirements size is 16 MB I still get this error. I have also tried to add I;m very new new vercel deployment. Earlier I used heroku and railway to deploy but, heroku removing the free tier I had to switch to other PaaS. I'm planning to try out vercel. If you can help me out with this it would be really great. I have also removed all the files under I want to know some ways on how to implement or config the
Please help me out thank you!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am also having the same problem, Next 13.4.1. I already tried every approach possible, but I can't seem to work around this. Is it possible that Next 13.4.1 is causing this? I tried using versions prior to Next 13 and it works fine. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am facing the same issue on Next 13.3.1 Large Dependencies Uncompressed size Compressed size15:01:37.048 | node_modules/.pnpm/@swc[email protected] 49.77 MB 16.53 MB |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I got it to work with the following experimental: {
outputFileTracingExcludes: {
'*': [
'node_modules/@swc/core-linux-x64-gnu',
'node_modules/@swc/core-linux-x64-musl',
'node_modules/@esbuild/linux-x64',
],
},
}, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Had this same issue when creating a static website. It seems that because The issue was that next to the markdown files, I had some static images that were getting bundled into the Functions, making them extremely big. As mentioned above, I fixed this issue by using
Hope this helps somebody. Before finding this solution I tried using both |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I’m struggling with that since a few days, and I’m getting nowhere. That’s the error message I get:
I’m trying to remove ‘framer-motion’ (just to start) from that list, as it’s used just client side. That’s my configuration for outputFileTracingExcludes. I’m on a monorepo, next folder is at ./packages/website/. I’ve tried with and without outputFileTracingRoot, none of those works.
I've also tried most of those combination individually, setting the key to various values like 'api/pdf', 'api/pdf/[slug]' 'api/pdf/*', etc. Some considerations I’ve made:
I’m using pnpm and Next 13.4.12. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'd like to share the process I applied based on the error resolution methods provided by the talented individuals above ( I speculated that this error might be related to
In my case, the issue within the
I found that these two libraries were only dependent on From this, I confirmed the possibility of Furthermore, the
Essential libraries like "Error: The Serverless Function "_error" is 50.07mb which exceeds the maximum size limit of 50mb," I will now provide the list of Large Dependencies, along with their uncompressed and compressed sizes:
After removing Among these, I noted dependencies with a direct relationship to From this list, I included libraries that seemed unlikely to be used at runtime in the options, and I was able to successfully complete the deployment. experimental: {
outputFileTracingExcludes: {
'*': [
'node_modules/@swc/**/*',
'node_modules/@esbuild/**/*',
'node_modules/terser/**/*',
'node_modules/webpack/**/*',
],
},
} |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In my case, deleting package-lock.json and running |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm getting this error as follows:
The offending file, // src/pages/sitemap.xml.jsx
import getStaticPagePaths from '@/lib/getStaticPagePaths'
import { getAllArticlePaths } from '@/lib/getAllArticles'
const Sitemap = () => {}
export default Sitemap
export const getServerSideProps = async ({ req, res }) => {
const baseUrl = `${
process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' ? 'https://' : 'http://'
}${req.headers.host}`
const staticPagePaths = await getStaticPagePaths()
const articlePaths = await getAllArticlePaths()
const allPaths = [...staticPagePaths, ...articlePaths]
const sitemap = `<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9">
${allPaths
.map((path) => `<url><loc>${baseUrl}${path}</loc></url>`)
.join('')}
</urlset>
`
res.setHeader('Content-Type', 'text/xml')
res.write(sitemap)
res.end()
return {
props: {},
}
} From the Vercel logs, it's the // src/pages/articles/index,jsx
// ...
import { getAllArticles } from '@/lib/getAllArticles'
// ...
export async function getStaticProps() {
return {
props: {
articles: (await getAllArticles()).map(({ component, ...meta }) => meta),
},
}
} From this I can assume that it's the // src/lib/getAllArticles.js
import glob from 'fast-glob'
import * as path from 'path'
const importArticle = async (articleFilename, pathOnly = false) => {
const { meta, default: component } = await import(
`../pages/articles/${articleFilename}`
)
const url = `/articles/${articleFilename.replace(/(\/index)?\.mdx$/, '')}`
if (pathOnly) return url
return {
url: url,
...meta,
component,
}
}
const fetchArticleFilenames = async () =>
await glob(['*.mdx', '*/index.mdx'], {
cwd: path.join(process.cwd(), 'src/pages/articles'),
})
export const getAllArticles = async () => {
const articleFilenames = await fetchArticleFilenames()
const articles = await Promise.all(
articleFilenames.map((filename) => importArticle(filename))
)
return articles.sort((a, z) => new Date(z.date) - new Date(a.date))
}
export const getAllArticlePaths = async () => {
const articleFilenames = await fetchArticleFilenames()
const articlePaths = await Promise.all(
articleFilenames.map((filename) => importArticle(filename, true))
)
return articlePaths
} I'm primarily a backend dev doing this as a hobby project, so errors like this put me a little out of my depth. Is there something obvious I'm missing? My two thoughts are:
Can anyone provide any insight into a fix or how to dig-into the cause? I've tried adding the following to my next config, but it made no difference to the build error: const nextConfig = {
// ...
experimental: {
// ...
outputFileTracingExcludes: {
'/*': ['./src/pages/articles/**/*.jpeg'],
'/**/*': ['./src/pages/articles/**/*.jpeg'],
},
},
} |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For anyone trying to get puppeteer to work in 2023: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If anyone is using the Flask + Next.js quick start (https://vercel.com/templates/next.js/nextjs-flask-starter), I've found that creating a
These is my
I debugged this by building with vercel locally and I found that the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm new to Vercel and trying to see if this 50 MB stuff is a deal-breaker before I spend more time on the platform. I have 2 separate backend APIs for different purposes: 1 in Node and 1 in python. For the python serverless functions, I only see a way to specify a single requirements.txt file in the root of the project. Is there a way to do this per lambda instead? Specifically, I have some routes involving auth libraries, and others involving computation with numpy etc. Including all this gets me to 60 MB. I'd like to have separate requirements files per lambda, and then I could set up multiple functions, each with a minimal set of dependancies, to help stay below the limit. Is this possible? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I disagree in the sense that Vercel doesn't let me do the normal things in
python to limit the package size. Specifically, I have multiple backend API
functions and normally I could give each one a different requirements.txt
and limit the packages, but Vercel requires everything to be bundled
together and only allows a single requirements.txt. for example. Overall
it seems like the python support is super basic, so for anything like this
I'm on my own.
…On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:31 AM Alvis Tang ***@***.***> wrote:
The 50MB is not Vercel specific, it's AWS. As long as AWS doesn't change
the limit, the only way out to deploy a lambda function larger than the
limit is to package the serverless function as a container image.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#103 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIEQPV7M6N3VX7XPXIALITX3WVNTANCNFSM5MWXFWFQ>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey everyone! I wanted to merge a few separate discussions into one. Occasionally, if you include large dependencies inside your functions, it can exceed the current max function limit of
50mb
on Vercel. For example, a common dependency that causes this is Puppeteer, because it's shipping an entire headless Chrome browser.If you're hitting this issue, you'll often see a message like this:
We recognize that right now, it's difficult to debug why you've exceeded your limit. We are working on providing tooling to assist with debugging the contents of your functions to understand what's contributing to the size.
Note: Next.js specifically bundles all API Routes and server-rendered pages into shared Serverless Functions, separating API routes and server-rendered pages when deployed on Vercel. Additional Serverless Functions are only created if they do not fit within the 50MB limit.
Replaces:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions