Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NIST CVE database has CVE-2022-23639 misrecorded? #1151

Closed
hgomersall opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

NIST CVE database has CVE-2022-23639 misrecorded? #1151

hgomersall opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@hgomersall
Copy link

I'm not sure this is your issue directly, but there seems to be a problem with how CVE-2022-23639 that was fixed here is referring to crossbeam, such that Black Duck is flagging Crossbeam 0.8.4 which clearly is post the fix.

Reading the "Known Affected Software Configurations", it clearly suggests that it's crossbeam that is the problem rather than crossbeam-utils, but I'm not very familiar with CVE records. In any case, something is not quite right with how the vulnerability is being reported.

@taiki-e
Copy link
Member

taiki-e commented Dec 7, 2024

If tool reports a vulnerability to crossbeam crate instead of crossbeam-utils crate, it is a bug in their tool. Please file a bug report against that tool.

@hgomersall
Copy link
Author

It looks like a bug in the database, or am I missing something?

@taiki-e
Copy link
Member

taiki-e commented Dec 9, 2024

I guess it's a bug in your vulnerability report tool.

@hgomersall
Copy link
Author

hgomersall commented Dec 9, 2024

This string: cpe:2.3:a:crossbeam_project:crossbeam:*:*:*:*:*:rust:*:* makes no distinction between crossbeam and crossbeam-utils, so it's hard to see how it can get this right.

Similarly, the CVE record also references crossbeam as the product: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23639

@taiki-e
Copy link
Member

taiki-e commented Dec 9, 2024

Sigh. GitHub again. They've done strange things about our report before, but it seems that was not the only problem.

@taiki-e
Copy link
Member

taiki-e commented Dec 9, 2024

Filed github/advisory-database#5064.

@hgomersall
Copy link
Author

Great, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants