Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hard to convert Complex TypeScript Interfaces to Zod Schema with full typing #3886

Open
alan890104 opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@alan890104
Copy link

Hi everyone,

I'm working on a TypeScript project and need to convert a set of complex interfaces into a Zod schema for runtime validation. Here's a simplified example of the interfaces I'm working with:

export type WithdrawMode = 'Single' | 'Balanced';

interface BaseWithdraw {
  pool: Address;
  removeLpAmount: bigint;
  queryId?: bigint;
  slippageTolerance?: Slippage;
  minAmountOuts?: IAllocation[] | IAllocation;
  extraPayload?: ExtraPayload;
}

interface NextWithdraw {
  pool: Address;
  mode: WithdrawMode;
  withdrawAsset?: Asset;
  removeLpAmount?: bigint;
}

interface SingleWithdrawBase extends BaseWithdraw {
  mode: 'Single';
}

export interface SingleWithdrawWithNext extends SingleWithdrawBase {
  nextWithdraw: NextWithdraw;
  withdrawAsset?: never;
}

interface SingleWithdrawNoNext extends SingleWithdrawBase {
  nextWithdraw?: NextWithdraw;
  withdrawAsset: Asset;
}

type SingleWithdrawParams = SingleWithdrawWithNext | SingleWithdrawNoNext;

interface BalancedWithdrawParams extends BaseWithdraw {
  mode: 'Balanced';
  nextWithdraw?: NextWithdraw;
}

export type WithdrawParams = SingleWithdrawParams | BalancedWithdrawParams;

My goal is to create Zod schemas for these types, especially for WithdrawParams, which involves unions and nested objects. I'm unsure how to handle the more complex parts, like:

  • Union types (SingleWithdrawParams and BalancedWithdrawParams)
  • Conditional fields (withdrawAsset and nextWithdraw)
  • Optional fields and nested objects (NextWithdraw)

Additionally, I have a specific requirement for the SingleWithdrawParams union:

For SingleWithdrawWithNext, I want the user to fill in only the nextWithdraw field, and not the withdrawAsset field.
For SingleWithdrawNoNext, I want the user to fill in only the withdrawAsset field, and not the nextWithdraw field.
These fields are mutually exclusive.

Could anyone provide guidance or examples of how to translate these interfaces into Zod schemas? Any advice or resources would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you!

Originally posted by @alan890104 in #3885

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant